The Grading Room

Every food, graded. No vibes — just the numbers.

Home / Versus / Ricotta (Part-Skim) vs Cottage Cheese (2%)

Head to head

Ricotta (Part-Skim) vs Cottage Cheese (2%)

The lasagna cheese against the diet cheese.

Ricotta (Part-Skim) takes it, 51 to 50. A 1-point gap. Lasagna's quiet protein contributor — 11.4g per 100g. Cottage Cheese (2%)’s case: Casein-heavy slow protein — great before bed. Heads up: these two are graded on different rubrics, so the scores aren’t strictly comparable — the tale of the tape above is the apples-to-apples part.

Tale of the tape

NutrientRicotta (Part-Skim)
per 100g
Cottage Cheese (2%)
per 100g
Calories13890 ●
Protein11.4g12g ●
Total Fat7.9g2g ●
Saturated Fat4.9g1.2g ●
Dietary Fiber0g0g
Sodium125mg ●349mg
Cholesterol31mg8mg ●
Potassium105mg ●104mg

Red dot marks the winner of each row. Column bases differ because chain labels are per serving — the per-100-calorie comparisons below put them on equal footing.

Where Ricotta (Part-Skim) wins

Where Cottage Cheese (2%) wins

Questions

Is Ricotta (Part-Skim) healthier than Cottage Cheese (2%)?

By our scoring, Ricotta (Part-Skim) grades higher (51 vs 50). The full nutrient comparison is in the tale of the tape above.

Which has more protein, Ricotta (Part-Skim) or Cottage Cheese (2%)?

Ricotta (Part-Skim): 8.3g per 100 calories. Cottage Cheese (2%): 13.3g per 100 calories.

How many calories are in Ricotta (Part-Skim) vs Cottage Cheese (2%)?

Ricotta (Part-Skim): 138 calories per 100g. Cottage Cheese (2%): 9 calories per 100g.

A note before you eat your screen: grades are computed from published nutrition data with a transparent formula. They are a starting point for thinking about food, not medical advice. Talk to your doctor or a registered dietitian about your diet.