The Grading Room

Every food, graded. No vibes — just the numbers.

Home / Versus / Bacon vs Pork Sausage Links

Head to head

Bacon vs Pork Sausage Links

The breakfast meat championship.

Bacon takes it, 55 to 54. A 1-point gap. Delicious. Nutritionally indefensible. We don't make the rules. Pork Sausage Links’s case: Salt and fat in link form — 814mg sodium per 100g. Watch out: Sodium and saturated fat nuke its score — enjoy it, don't optimize with it.

Tale of the tape

NutrientBacon
per 100g
Pork Sausage Links
per 100g
Calories541325 ●
Protein37g ●18.5g
Total Fat42g27.2g ●
Saturated Fat14g8.8g ●
Dietary Fiber0g0g
Total Sugars0g ●1.1g
Sodium1717mg814mg ●
Cholesterol110mg86mg ●
Potassium321mg342mg ●

Red dot marks the winner of each row. Column bases differ because chain labels are per serving — the per-100-calorie comparisons below put them on equal footing.

Where Bacon wins

Where Pork Sausage Links wins

Questions

Is Bacon healthier than Pork Sausage Links?

By our scoring, Bacon grades higher (55 vs 54). The full nutrient comparison is in the tale of the tape above.

Which has more protein, Bacon or Pork Sausage Links?

Bacon: 6.8g per 100 calories. Pork Sausage Links: 5.7g per 100 calories.

How many calories are in Bacon vs Pork Sausage Links?

Bacon: 541 calories per 100g. Pork Sausage Links: 325 calories per 100g.

A note before you eat your screen: grades are computed from published nutrition data with a transparent formula. They are a starting point for thinking about food, not medical advice. Talk to your doctor or a registered dietitian about your diet.